Use the Internet to locate at least two (2) advertisements that exhibit any of the following fallacies: equivocation, false authority, ad hominem, appeal to ignorance, or bandwagon. Post the videos in the discussion. Next, identify the fallacy used in the selected advertisements, discuss the primary reasons why you believe that the advertisers have used the fallacy in question, and examine whether or not their use of this type of fallacy is effective.
From part 1 of this discussion, consider alternate strategies that the advertisers could have used in order to develop a more sound and persuasive argument. Explain the main reasons why you believe consumers ignore these errors in reasoning.
RESPOND TO FOLLOWING STATEMENT:
The first ad that I chose is http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A2KLqIAw2YBY6mgAuXs0nIlQ;_ylu=X3oDMTByZWc0dGJtBHNlYwNzcgRzbGsDdmlkBHZ0aWQDBGdwb3MDMQ–/RV=2/RE=1484868017/RO=11/RU=http%3a%2f%2fvideo.foxnews.com%2fv%2f5123278995001%2fdid-trump-really-mock-reporters-disability%2f/RK=0/RS=xH5MpEi5k7BLoyE8t_h1BTmvlOE- This ad is infamous as the one where Donald Trump attacks the disabled reporter. This shows ad hominem since he was attacking the being of the person and not the substance of their comments or arguments. The reporter has a bonafide medical issue. Donald Trump chose to make fun of him since he didn’t like the reporter or what he stood for or was trying to ask. While the ad did get the name Donald Trump remembered even more, I do not think it is a good type of ad to run because, as a voter, I want someone who can be aggressive when needed but compassionate when appropriate and making fun of someone who is disabled shows no compassion – definitely not the lesson I want my kids learning. Since it was run by his competitor, it is effective in showing the type of individual he is but I do not like attack ads at all. I think ads should tell me what you can do for me and not why the other options are no good.